Influence of mass and potential energy surface geometry on roaming in Chesnavich’s CH+4 model

Article, “Influence of mass and potential energy surface geometry on roaming in Chesnavich’s CH4+ model,” was published 07 September 2018, in The Journal of Chemical Physics (Vol.149, Issue 9).  Vladimir Krajnak and Stephen Wiggins

It may be accessed via the link below:
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5044532
DOI: 10.1063/1.5044532

Chesnavich’s model Hamiltonian for the reaction CH+4 → CH+3 + H is known to exhibit a range of interesting dynamical phenomena including roaming. The model system consists of two parts: a rigid, symmetric top representing the CH+3 ion and a free H atom. We study roaming in this model with focus on the evolution of geometrical features of the invariant manifolds in phase space that govern roaming under variations of the mass of the free atom m and a parameter a that couples radial and angular motion. In addition, we establish an upper bound on the prominence of roaming in Chesnavich’s model. The bound highlights the intricacy of roaming as a type of dynamics on the verge between isomerisation and nonreactivity as it relies on generous access to the potential wells to allow reactions as well as a prominent area of high potential that aids sufficient transfer of energy between the degrees of freedom to prevent isomerisation.

CHAMPS PDRAs attend the Workshop on the “Geometry of Chemical Reaction Dynamics in Gas and Condensed Phases” held at the Telluride Science Center on July 17-27, 2018

In July 2018, three of the CHAMPS PDRA’s: Rafael Garcia Meseguer, Matthaios Katsanikas and Vladimir Krajnak, attended the workshop ‘Geometry of Chemical Reaction Dynamics in Gas and Condensed Phases’ at the Telluride Science Research Center in Telluride, CO, USA. The meeting focussed on theoretical aspects of chemical reaction dynamics and forms a platform for discussions about extensions of theory from lower to higher dimensional systems and from gas to condensed phases. Apart from meeting some of the leading researchers in the field and discussing ideas for future work, the PDRA’s also shared their contributions to the field. Rafael gave a talk on the applications of Lagrangian descriptors to finding dividing surfaces and invariant structures, Matthaios shared his findings on phase space transport in the Caldera model and Vladimir reported on the phase space mechanism behind Roaming in Chesnavich’s model and its evolution under parameter variations.

Telluride 2018 #1Telluride 2018 #2Telluride 2018 #3

 

 

CHAMPS Research day at Imperial College London – 13th July 2018.

CHAMPS held a research day at Imperial College London on Friday 13th July 2018. This provided an  opportunity for all of the investigators and PDRAs to discuss their research and obtain feedback from the entire CHAMPS team.

A copy of the schedule for the day can be found here: Research Day 13.07.18 Schedule

Geometry of nonadiabatic quantum hydrodynamics

Geometry of nonadiabatic quantum hydrodynamics

Michael. S. Foskett, Darryl. D. Holm, Cesare Tronci

(Submitted on 3 Jul 2018)

By using standard momentum maps from geometric mechanics, we collectivize the mean-field (MF) and exact factorization (EF) models of molecular quantum dynamics into two different quantum fluid models. After deriving the corresponding quantum fluid models, we regularize each of their Hamiltonians for finite  by introducing spatial smoothing. The 0 dynamics of the Lagrangian paths of the classical nuclear fluid flows for both MF and EF can be written and contrasted as finite dimensional canonical Hamiltonian systems for the evolution in phase space of singular solutions called Bohmions, in which each nucleus follows a Lagrangian path in configuration space. Comparison is also made with the variational dynamics of a new type of Bohmian trajectories, which arise from Hamilton’s principle with spatially smoothed quantum potential with finite .

https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01031

 

CHAMPS Leeds group – Journal of Chemical Physics papers

The CHAMPS Leeds group just published in the Journal of Chemical Physics two papers related to CHAMPS Work Projects 4 and 5 on quantum dynamics and nonadiabatic dynamics. In the first paper “The effect of sampling techniques used in the multiconfigurational Ehrenfest method” by C.Symonds, J.Kattitzi and D.Shalashilin (https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.5020567) Spin-Boson model was used to assess the samplings of Canonical Coherent States basis sets in the phase space quantum mechanics. The paper validated the sampling techniques used in our simulations of ultrafast photochemical reactions. It has been demonstrated that the techniques really work and for the Spin-Boson model the calculations converge to the exact quantum result.  The Figure below shows quantum wave functions in phase space.

DS - webpage photo

In the second paper Zombie states for description of structure and dynamics of multi-electron systems by D.Shalashilin (https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.5023209) a new type of Fermionic Coherent State has been introduced, which potentially can be used in simulations of nonadiabatic dynamics in chemistry and photochemistry. Fermionic Coherent States are well known in mathematics.  However, they require complicated algebra of Grassmann numbers not well suited for numerical simulations in computational chemistry.  The paper introduces a coherent antisymmetrised superposition of “dead” and “alive” electronic states called Zombie State (ZS), which do not need Grassmann algebra.  Instead it is replaced by a very simple sign-changing rule in the definition of creation and annihilation operators.  Zombie States can be used as basis functions for quantum propagation just like Canonical Coherent States for distinguishable particles.  As it is shown at the Figure in standard electronic structure and dynamics theories (left frame) some spin-orbitals are occupied by electrons and some are empty. In Zombie States (right frame) all orbitals are occupied, but some electrons are more “alive” than “dead” or more “dead” than “alive”.  The term “Zombie” for simultaneously “dead” and “alive” electrons was proposed by Liz Clark, Bristol School of Mathematics manager, who is acknowledged in the paper!

DS - webpage photo #2

2018 Robert G. Bergman Lecture. Professor Barry Carpenter

Robert G. Bergman Lecture: What is a transition state, and why should I care?

13th March 2018. University of California, Berkeley.

Featured Speaker:  Prof. Barry Carpenter, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol

Since the early days of the development of Transition State Theory, there have been two descriptions of what a transition state (TS) is. The one that most chemists use identifies the TS with a saddle point on the potential energy surface (PES). The other is that it is a dividing surface (DS) in phase space, which reactive trajectories cross only once on their transit from reactant to product. Under limited circumstances, the two descriptors can be shown to be equivalent, but in most practical circumstances they are not. The DS description is the more rigorous, and this talk will focus on cases in which the location of the DS in configuration space is far from any PES saddle point. A common example occurs for reactions in solution that involve substantial changes in shape of the solute. If there are parallel paths to competing products after such an event, then incorrect identification of the true location of the TS can lead to a misunderstanding of what controls the product ratio. That, in turn, has obvious consequences for efforts to control product ratios through change of conditions or design of catalysts.

Carpenter

‘theoretically speaking’ podcast: david glowacki talks about reaction dynamics

Screen Shot 2018-03-09 at 11.46.00The picture we have in our heads about how reactions proceed is often extremely simplified. David Glowacki recently had the pleasure to sit down with Theoretically Speaking, a podcast which is broadcast from Oxford (and which has its origins in the ‘Theory and Modelling in the Chemical Sciences’ Centre for Doctoral Training). The topic was molecular reaction dynamics, and David discussed with the podcast hosts a range of topics, including how to accurately model molecular reaction dynamics in real-world systems, and also about how new developments in virtual reality and GPU-accelerated computing enable us to visualise complex chemical systems in cutting edge research applications. You can listen to the episode here.